My place to ramblefest, named after Chernabog, my favorite Disney Villain.
Friday, December 07, 2007
I finally read Harry Potter...
Until now... A friend is reading them with her son and recommended them saying it's a good story and an easy read.
So, on a recent business trip I grabbed the first book out of DH's library. I read it in a day, definitely an easy read and not a bad story.
I've told a couple people I didn't like Harry Potter. My sister's reaction was an incredulous, "You didn't like Harry Potter?!?!" Okay, maybe "didn't like" is a bit strong, but frankly I was underwhelmed. I expected something that would grab me and pull me into the story. That because I wasn't going to be home for two days after I finished the book, I'd go nuts waiting to get home to pick up book two. But none of that happened. I finished the book and came home and put it back in the library and picked up something else that isn't Harry Potter. (I've currently got my nose in four books, but will drop them all if I get Wild Fire by Nelson DeMille for Chanukah. I've been wanting to read it for over a year and wanted to pick it up in November when it came out in paperback, but I digress.)
My life will go on if I don't read the other six Potter books, but I'll be definitely disappointed if I don't get ahold of Wild Fire sometime soon.
Now, I've promised my niece that if she wants to read and discuss the books, I'm happy to continue, but I don't know if she's interested. If she's not, that's fine, I'll go on to the gazillion books sitting around here yearning to be read.
I honestly don't think I would have be crazy for Harry as a younger me. As I mentioned, I read Tolkien around age 11. I tried to get into the books around age 9, had a tough time and put them aside for two years. I just don't think Harry's adventures would have appealed to me then, either. Of course, by then I was reading my Dad's old Fantasy & Science Fiction magazines and books. Oh and Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine which is detective fiction. (Dang! They both still exist!)
Harry Potter definitely has done good in getting kids interested in reading that possibly wouldn't have been before. He's just not for me.
She Lived Up to Her Name...Risa
Several people told us about the Rainbow Bridge. You can read it here. People told us about their beloved dogs who Risa will be playing with at Rainbow Bridge. I envision this as her new pack, at least until we can join her. Risa's new pack includes:
TK, Princess, Putt-Putt, and Kuma (my beautiful dogs when I was growing up)
Ting-Ling (DH's dog)
Schoep, Beschert, Trapper (Laurie)
Patch and Rusty (PastorDan)
Mooch, Wicket, Pepper, Simon, and Toby (SaraBeth)
Brillig (Brillig)
Dickens (Zoskie)
Erla, Ranger, and Scout (Sharon)
On my desk at work I have a picture of her and pictures of her in my screensaver slideshow. I can look at these pictures daily and smile when I think of her. However, at other times, I just lose it. I was organizing some papers one day and found a receipt from a vet visit earlier this year before this ordeal started... I burst into tears. The certificate from Bubbling Well (see aforementioned DH blog) came the other day. At first I thought I was okay and then I sat down and cried.
Risa sure lived up to her name, providing us with nearly 10 1/2 years of laughter and good times. After she went to sleep we sat and told stories about Risa and we still do, "Do you remember when Risa...?" And my line has been that we'll be vacuuming her fur from the carpet for years to come. <grin>
Bye baby dog, I'll miss you. Thank you for sharing your life and love with us.
"We give dogs time we can spare, space we can spare and love we can spare. And in return, dogs give us their all. It's the best deal man has ever made." -M. Acklam
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Puppy Update (Pupdate?)
-hgs
Saturday, October 13, 2007
I am thankful Risa is asleep at my feet...
Sunday, October 07, 2007
kinda funny....
Thursday, August 16, 2007
CNN Breaking News - NOT!
Are you freaking kidding me!?!?! Going to cnn.com (waste of time) shows the Padilla story as a developing story (with a yellow banner) and the "breaking news story" in a red banner. Sorry, some girl getting married, even if she is the daughter of tstbp, is not breaking news over the Padilla verdict.
It may be news if she's preggers or marrying a woman since that flies in the face of republican "family values", but still...
Argh! Our priorities are so messed up!
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:04 AM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
-- President Bush's daughter, Jenna, is engaged to be married, the White
House says.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
The problem with George Bush
Check out the headline at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush, it reads,
Isn't it true that when you stand behind something, you're afraid of or trying to hide from something?
What is he hiding from? What is he afraid of that he has to stand behind a failed Iraq policy?
Monday, June 11, 2007
Whose Government is it Again?
"...government of the people, by the people, for the people,..."
George W. Bush, in response to a question about the looming no-confidence vote on Attorney General, Alberto Gonzalez, June 11, 2007, Sofia, Bulgaria:
"Yes, it's an interesting comment about Congress, isn't it, that, on the one hand, they say that a good general shouldn't be reconfirmed, and on the other hand, they say that my Attorney General shouldn't stay. And I find it interesting. I guess it reflects the political atmosphere of Washington. And they can try to have their votes of no confidence, but it's not going to determine -- make the determination who serves in my government."
Whose government is it Mr. Bush? It's your Administration, but it sure ain't your government.
Please read the Constitution of the United States, a document you swore to uphold and defend. You've done neither. Please understand the separation of powers, all power is NOT VESTED in a single executive. Your power to execute treaties and nominate public officials, among others, is with the ADVICE and CONSENT of the SENATE. They have every right to not reconfirm a general or to issue a vote of no-confidence on the AG.
Signed,
One VERY PISSED OFF "lucy"
Thursday, June 07, 2007
Tancredo on Roe
When I couldn't sleep last night, I watched some event that most of the Republican candidates were at. They took their turns speaking. The scariest comment of the night came from Mr. Tancredo: "I oppose Roe. I promise to free women from the bondage of legalized abortion."
My response:
Tom Tancredo is frickin' scary. I don't feel that I'm in bondage over having a choice of what to do with my body. However, if I am forced to do something with my body that I don't want to, then I may feel like I'm in bondage.
Saturday, April 28, 2007
I admit it...
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Oh no he didn't say that!
"Democratic presidential candidates on Wednesday rebuked Republican rival Rudy Giuliani for suggesting that the United States could face another major terrorist attack if a Democrat is elected in 2008. The former New York mayor did not back down."
(emphasis added)
Questions:
Q: Who was President of the US on September 11, 2001?
A: George W. Bush
Q: What is George W. Bush's party affliation?
A: Republican
Q: Where was Rudy Giuliani on September 11, 2001?
A: Doing damage control after the World Trade Center was attacked. (Probably the only thing he did right during an otherwise dismal turn as mayor of NYC.)
Q: What is Rudy Giuliani's party affiliation?
A: Republican
Q: Any more questions?
And they're afraid we'll have another terrorist attack if a Democrat is elected?
WOW!
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Hummingbirds
He is buried in Colma, a town just south of San Francisco. The local joke is that there are more dead people than living people in Colma.
(Colma became the town for burials after San Francisco outlawed burials within the city limits in 1900 and all bodies were exhumed by 1937. You can read a real brief history of Colma here).
My Dad and I were close, so it was only natural that on the morning of my wedding, I go up to Colma (20 minute drive) and talk to him.
Colma is one of those towns on the San Francisco Peninsula that is usually very foggy and cold. In the, at the time, nearly 15 years I had been visiting him, I usually had to dress warmly. There were a few sunny days, but that was the exception, not the norm. (On one particularly cold and foggy day, they turned on the sprinklers as I sat there.)
So, the morning of my wedding I head up to Colma, and it's a beautiful day. The sun was out, there was no fog to be seen. I sit down on the ground and talk to my Dad and meditate and do whatever. The next thing I know, there are two hummingbirds flitting about the nearby hedge. Not only in those nearly 15 years had sun been a rarity, but I never saw hummingbirds there. And I've seen no hummingbirds in the 10 years since.
That, to me, was a message from my Dad, that he was blessing my marriage. Looking back on what we've been through in the last 10 years, it's nice to know that he might be watching out for us. I get chills every time I think about that morning and probably will for the rest of my life.
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
CNN Breaking News... HA!
>>>Subject: CNN Breaking News
>>>-- Larry Birkhead is the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby, a court
in the Bahamas rules. Birkhead said he hopes to have custody soon.
Oh I am SO GLAD this was breaking news. I've been on the edge of my
seat for days knowing they were releasing this info today.
NOT!!!
Like there's nothing else going on in the world that they need to track
the baby daddy of some tragic playboy bunny gold-digger.
Dear god, that child is destined for a tragic life. (Christina Onassis
anyone?)
Okay let's see:
war in Iraq and Afghanistan (remember that one?);
impending war in Iran;
delegations to Syria and North Korea;
murders on the streets of Oakland, San Francisco, and other cities;
the destruction of the middle class;
hell, even Imus's comments about the Rutgers Women's basketball team and
the ensuing firestorm.
UGH!
</soapbox>
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
flag-burning amendment
Contrast her quote with that from the ACLU:
""The symbol should not be valued more than the freedoms it represents," said Terri Ann Schroeder, ACLU Senior Lobbyist."
Here is a good editorial in the LA Times about why flag burning should not be constitutionally banned:
If you are opposed to this amendment to the Constitution (this ain't just a law) folks, you can contact her office at http://feinstein.senate.gov/ or call her at (202) 224-3841.
The case for flag-burning
THERE ARE MANY ARGUMENTS AGAINST a proposed constitutional amendment to outlaw "the physical desecration of the flag of the United States." Let us count the ways in which the amendment, which is disturbingly close to the 67 votes required for Senate approval, is unworthy of that body's support:
• The reintroduction of this amendment is part of the Republican Party's election-year attempt to rile up its social-conservative base, a "panderama" that already has produced a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, which failed earlier this month. That reality alone should cause Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to reconsider her support for the flag-burning amendment.
But the best argument against the flag amendment is the one some opponents are reluctant to make for fear of political fallout: It would make America less free.
Rare as flag-burning may be, a nation that allows citizens to denounce even its most sacred symbols is being true to what the Supreme Court in 1964 called the "profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials."
In that decision, and in 1989, the court interpreted the free-speech protections of the 1st Amendment generously but correctly. The Senate, including Feinstein and fellow Democrat and Californian Barbara Boxer (who has opposed a flag-burning amendment in the past), should let those decisions be.
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
VOTE DAMMIT!
Monday, June 05, 2006
AIDS: 25 years of an epidemic
My DH sent an email to his family today, mainly what he said at http://mootepoint.blogspot.com/2006/06/grim-milestone.html, except with the following links:
The SF Chronicle also has several articles online at http://www.sfgate.com/aidsat25. In case you don’t have time to look at all their extensive coverage, here are a couple of highlights:
This 1982 article by Randy Shilts (author of And the Band Played On) is a tear-jerker:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/02/17/DDGVB5133M1.DTL
The article contains a “more things change, the more they stay the same” line: “And when one gay victim of pneumocystis lapsed into a semi-coma, his relatives tried to strike his lover's name from the guest list and forbid him from seeing the dying man”
This picture is worth a quick look. It’s a heartbreaker that everybody should see as a reminder:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?o=1&f=/c/a/2006/06/04/ING97J7LD31.DTL
I humbly request that everybody take a moment to remember the half million Americans who have died over the last 25 years, the lost generation in
I took his email and forwarded it to my mom and sister with the following commentary:
"I'm forwarding D's email to you because we lived at ground zero of the start of the AIDS epidemic.
I remember the friends that disappeared. I remember the guy upstairs who just wanted to die at home when that eviction crap went on. (God help me, I forget his name.)
I was in tears reading the article and picture D. referenced. While AIDS is no longer just a "gay man's disease", I get angered by the young gay men who don't know to remember and don't take precautions because AIDS is now manageable. Why not try to eradicate it than live with it? Look at what's happened in
And today, of all days, Bush is giving a speech in favor of a constitutional amendment to ban "gay marriage" and the Senate is debating this issue. Have they no compassion for those who have died? For those who continue to live with HIV/AIDS? "Gay marriage" is not unnatural to me. Again, I think of the guys upstairs and next door on Central. I don't think growing up around the "gay lifestyle" has made me a bad person or weakened my marriage. Sure, D. and I have seen our share of challenges, but frankly, "gay marriage" is not one of them!
I just want to scream at the people who don't want their kids around the "gay lifestyle", at the people who think that their marriage is threatened by "Adam and Steve" getting married. At those people who won't talk about AIDS because it's a "gay disease", a "poor disease", a disease in
D. keeps telling me I had an unusual childhood. Maybe I'm just more enlightened than most folks, but I just don't understand, I really don't and it makes me very sad."
Thursday, January 06, 2005
Today's Random Thoughts
I am writing to ask you to stand with Congressman Conyers tomorrow, January 6, to challenge the voting tally from the November 2nd election. I know that this challenge will do nothing to overturn the result of this election, however, it is important to open a dialogue about voting inconsistencies and problems in this country.
I volunteered for your Congressional campaign when I was in high school as part of a Civics assignment. One of the most important duties an American citizen can do is vote. If people feel their votes don't count, they won't vote and that will be the end of our great American experiment.
Please consider supporting Congressman Conyers to give all Americans a Civics lesson on how the Constitution should work.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Thursday, October 14, 2004
Ruskin v Poizner
I live in the 21st Assembly District in California. Our Assemblyman has termed out and is running for State Senate, so two new guys are running. The Democrat is Ira Ruskin. He serves on the Redwood City City Council, has been mayor of our city (largest city in the district), and has a good record on the issues important to me. (Guess who I'm voting for?!?) His Republican opponent is Steve Poizner, a rich man who is out-raising Ruskin 4-1. (Another example of a Republican trying to buy an election in California. Haven't they figured out that it doesn't work?) It's been a pretty nasty race, especially for a State Assembly seat. It's also a Democratic district and has had Democratic representation for a very long time.
Lately these guys have been sending out mailers trying to affirm their positions and cut down that of their opponent, but this time Poizner really got to me. He has never served on a city council, but was a White House fellow, starting in September 2001... that means under THIS president. He states that he is a moderate Republican and is pro-choice and has gotten a pro-choice rating from Planned Parenthood.
Ruskin's campaign material points out that Poizner "contributed thousands of dollars to national pro-life council endorsed candidates". Guess what?!?! This isn't a lie. A simple check of the Federal Elections Commission website shows that Poizner has contributed $18,000 to political committees since 2000. Granted, he contributed $2,000 to Kerry in February 2001. However, he contributed $2,000 to George Bush in June 2003 and $2,000 to the Congressional campaign of Kris Kobach in Kansas. Who is this Kris Kobach person? Well, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, "The other donation in question was to a Kansas congressional candidate who served with Poizner in a nonpartisan White House fellowship program." So, Poizner is just giving money to his "bud". The implication being that since the program was non-partisan, the money must be, too. (Poizner's using this quote in his campaign literature, he's trying to get readers to believe that this is a logical progression.) But guess what? This "bud" has been endorsed by Kansans for Life "as an especially attractive candidate to pro-life citizens." (Right off Kobach's website!)
So, our pro-choice "rated" candidate is endorsing candidates attractive to pro-life citizens both in Kansas and nationally (because you canNOT tell me that George W. Bush is not anti-choice!) While the man is free to give his money to whomever he chooses (notice he gave the maximum contribution in all cases), if he is TRULY PRO-CHOICE why would he give money to candidates that advance the anti-choice agenda!??!!?!?
Thursday, October 07, 2004
Are you freaking kidding me?!?!?!
George W. Bush has to be the most dangerous man in the world, his actions have caused the mess in Iraq, as well as Iran and North Korea ramping up their nuclear programs. He bitches about Saddam's intent, but he should be reminded that the U.S. is still the only country in the world to actually deploy nuclear weapons. He uses "September the eleventh" as his excuse for EVERYTHING, that the world has changed since then and we need to be safer. I say there's no way to know if we are safer than September 10, 2001 cuz we don't have anything to compare it to. On 9/10/2001, I thought our airport security sucked and today, 10/7/2004, I still think it sucks. But, then again, I've been to Israel. El Al's security is the best in the world and until we achieve such a level, we're no safer than that fateful day. Sure there have been no attacks on American soil since then, but there have been attacks against American interests and allies. Shrub hasn't kept the terrorists off our soil, I don't think they will attack again on American soil, they don't need to, they've won, we've sufficiently changed our way of life that we're worried about them. Especially when the freaking Bush Administration puts out predictable "terror alerts". (And we know they will increase as we move closer to the election.)
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
On a related note, cuz George Bush is partly to blame, three (3!) bombs went off at Israeli vacation spots in Egypt. IN EGYPT!!! They're freaking attacking Jews on Arab soil!!!! I was hoping there would be no attacks during the chagim. There weren't, they waited until after, when people were decompressing (my word) from the holidays. According to the Jerusalem Post a previously unknown group called World Islamist Group is claiming responsibility in the name of "martyrs dying in Palestine and Iraq."
I've been in tears for the last hour or so between hearing about the Duelfer report and the bombs in Egypt. This stuff makes me sick to my stomach. Shrub has so f*cked up the world ... he HAS to be defeated on November 2! We can't handle anymore of his actions. He blames everyone and everything else except himself, he refuses to admit that he's done anything wrong. Hmmm.... seems to me that only God is infallible, man makes mistakes and Bush claims to be God-fearing. F*cking hypocrite.